It's been a while since I identified myself as an Edupunk. In fact it seems it was only 6 weeks after the term was coined that I outed myself as an Edupunk, and now people want to talk to me about it.
This week I had a conference call with some researchers from Ryerson University in Canada who are investigating Maker Culture, and as part of that are researching 'makers' in education, which includes the Edupunk movement.
Of course, I've linked here to more authoritative sources on what Edupunk is, although I did give the researchers my own definition of Edupunk, which you can listen to if you follow this link to the podcast.
Edupunk is only a name, and there are many more educators who wouldn't want to be called 'Edupunk' who regularly do good things in the classroom, challenging the curriculum, finding shortcuts and better ways to teach, engaging students with self-created devices, or hacking/mashing together learning tools. I personally like the Edupunk tag, as long as it's not taken too seriously - there's been too much debate over the name, it's the culture and community that matters. As Shakespeare would say 'A rose by any other name would smell as sweet'. It's what educators do that matters, and if there's a slowly emerging group of educators willing to push the limits to educate their students, then education authorities need to take notice and recognise that these educators are doing this in the best interests of their students, and are doing so because there is something rotten in the current system. Something needs fixed, and the people who are fixing it, mending the leaks, baling out the ship are those at the sharp end of education, the people who do education every day, people who don't just see students as little bags of funding, people who are frustrated by the constraints placed upon them, people who care, and those people are teachers.